HVT vs LOW

Haverty Furniture Companies, In vs Lowe's Companies, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HVT

Home Improvement Retail
Haverty Furniture Companies, In
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$23.82
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

LOW

Home Improvement Retail
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$217.92
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HVT Fair ValueHVT Upside LOW Fair ValueLOW Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.76 -21.2% $108.14 -50.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.58 -97.1% $67.15 -69.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HVT vs LOW — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HVT vs LOW — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LOW scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs HVT's 8.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Haverty Furniture Companies, In (HVT) and Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HVT currently trades at $23.82 with a QOC of 8.0/10, while LOW trades at $217.92 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).