HURC vs MKSI

Hurco Companies, Inc. vs MKS Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HURC

Industrial Instruments For Measurement, Display, and Control
Hurco Companies, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$17.17
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

MKSI

Industrial Instruments For Measurement, Display, and Control
MKS Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$324.26
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HURC Fair ValueHURC Upside MKSI Fair ValueMKSI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $39.31 +128.9% $24.13 -92.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.60 -44.3% $469.87 +44.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HURC vs MKSI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HURC vs MKSI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MKSI scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs HURC's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hurco Companies, Inc. (HURC) and MKS Inc. (MKSI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HURC currently trades at $17.17 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while MKSI trades at $324.26 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).