HST vs IRM

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. vs Iron Mountain Incorporated (Del — Valuation Comparison 2026

HST

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$22.98
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

IRM

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Iron Mountain Incorporated (Del
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$128.25
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HST Fair ValueHST Upside IRM Fair ValueIRM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $15.50 -32.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.49 -76.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $22.02 -4.2% $168.99 +31.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $123.41 +437.0% $9.15 -92.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HST vs IRM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HST vs IRM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HST scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs IRM's 7.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (Del (IRM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HST currently trades at $22.98 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while IRM trades at $128.25 with a QOC of 7.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).