HR vs INN

Healthcare Realty Trust Incorpo vs Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HR

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorpo
Quality
5.2
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$19.92
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

INN

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$5.77
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HR Fair ValueHR Upside INN Fair ValueINN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $9.42 -52.7% $4.45 -12.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.59 -91.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $22.28 +11.8% $20.23 +250.5%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HR vs INN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HR vs INN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

INN scores higher with a 6.4/10 quality rating vs HR's 5.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Healthcare Realty Trust Incorpo (HR) and Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (INN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HR currently trades at $19.92 with a QOC of 5.2/10, while INN trades at $5.77 with a QOC of 6.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).