HQL vs HTGC

TeklaLife Sciences Investors vs Hercules Capital, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HQL

Asset Management
TeklaLife Sciences Investors
Quality
1.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$17.67
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

HTGC

Asset Management
Hercules Capital, Inc.
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
40
WARN
Price
$15.42
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HQL Fair ValueHQL Upside HTGC Fair ValueHTGC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.68 -73.5% $2.68 -83.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.71 -89.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $71.50 +307.4% $40.08 +159.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HQL vs HTGC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HQL vs HTGC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HTGC scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs HQL's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing TeklaLife Sciences Investors (HQL) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HQL currently trades at $17.67 with a QOC of 1.9/10, while HTGC trades at $15.42 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).