HOOD vs IBKR

Robinhood Markets, Inc. vs Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HOOD

Capital Markets
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
36
LOW
Price
$84.84
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

IBKR

Capital Markets
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
36
LOW
Price
$83.11
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HOOD Fair ValueHOOD Upside IBKR Fair ValueIBKR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $44.68 -47.3% $18.91 -77.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $23.36 -72.5% $19.92 -76.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HOOD vs IBKR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HOOD vs IBKR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HOOD scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs IBKR's 9.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HOOD currently trades at $84.84 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while IBKR trades at $83.11 with a QOC of 9.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).