HOG vs LOBO

Harley-Davidson, Inc. vs LOBO TECHNOLOGIES LTD. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HOG

Motorcycles, Bicycles & Parts
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
7
SAFE
Price
$24.18
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

LOBO

Motorcycles, Bicycles & Parts
LOBO TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.79
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HOG Fair ValueHOG Upside LOBO Fair ValueLOBO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $59.99 +148.1% $0.13 -84.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $32.98 +36.4% $1.12 +73.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HOG vs LOBO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HOG vs LOBO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HOG scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs LOBO's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) and LOBO TECHNOLOGIES LTD. (LOBO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HOG currently trades at $24.18 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while LOBO trades at $0.79 with a QOC of 2.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).