HMR vs HSHP

Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. vs Himalaya Shipping Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HMR

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp.
Quality
5.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$1.23
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

HSHP

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$14.75
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HMR Fair ValueHMR Upside HSHP Fair ValueHSHP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.60 +30.2% $2.68 -81.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.70 -43.2% $0.92 -93.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HMR vs HSHP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HMR vs HSHP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HSHP scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs HMR's 5.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR) and Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HMR currently trades at $1.23 with a QOC of 5.2/10, while HSHP trades at $14.75 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).