HLMN vs SSD

Hillman Solutions Corp. vs Simpson Manufacturing Company, — Valuation Comparison 2026

HLMN

Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware
Hillman Solutions Corp.
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$7.46
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

SSD

Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware
Simpson Manufacturing Company,
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$189.74
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HLMN Fair ValueHLMN Upside SSD Fair ValueSSD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.25 -96.6% $128.59 -32.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.18 -30.5% $84.79 -55.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HLMN vs SSD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HLMN vs SSD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SSD scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs HLMN's 7.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN) and Simpson Manufacturing Company, (SSD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HLMN currently trades at $7.46 with a QOC of 7.4/10, while SSD trades at $189.74 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).