HLIT vs HPE

Harmonic Inc. vs Hewlett Packard Enterprise Comp — Valuation Comparison 2026

HLIT

Communication Equipment
Harmonic Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
22
SAFE
Price
$17.00
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

HPE

Communication Equipment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Comp
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$38.21
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HLIT Fair ValueHLIT Upside HPE Fair ValueHPE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.90 -65.3% $3.61 -90.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.09 -75.9% $6.74 -82.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HLIT vs HPE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HLIT vs HPE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HLIT scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs HPE's 7.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Comp (HPE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HLIT currently trades at $17.00 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while HPE trades at $38.21 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).