HLI vs IBKR

Houlihan Lokey, Inc. vs Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HLI

Capital Markets
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$145.77
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

IBKR

Capital Markets
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
36
LOW
Price
$83.11
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HLI Fair ValueHLI Upside IBKR Fair ValueIBKR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $169.87 +16.5% $18.91 -77.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $72.93 -50.0% $19.92 -76.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HLI vs IBKR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HLI vs IBKR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HLI scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs IBKR's 9.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HLI currently trades at $145.77 with a QOC of 9.7/10, while IBKR trades at $83.11 with a QOC of 9.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).