HKD vs HTT

AMTD Digital Inc. vs High Templar Tech Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

HKD

Finance Services
AMTD Digital Inc.
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$1.82
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

HTT

Finance Services
High Templar Tech Limited
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$2.99
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HKD Fair ValueHKD Upside HTT Fair ValueHTT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.33 -80.4% $9.20 +207.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.19 -50.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $0.49 -71.6% $2.69 -10.0%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HKD vs HTT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HKD vs HTT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HTT scores higher with a 7.3/10 quality rating vs HKD's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD) and High Templar Tech Limited (HTT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HKD currently trades at $1.82 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while HTT trades at $2.99 with a QOC of 7.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).