HIHO vs WTS

Highway Holdings Limited vs Watts Water Technologies, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HIHO

Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Products
Highway Holdings Limited
Quality
2.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.76
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

WTS

Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Products
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$308.98
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HIHO Fair ValueHIHO Upside WTS Fair ValueWTS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.15 -79.8% $149.03 -51.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.22 -73.4% $76.71 -75.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HIHO vs WTS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HIHO vs WTS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WTS scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs HIHO's 2.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) and Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HIHO currently trades at $0.76 with a QOC of 2.7/10, while WTS trades at $308.98 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).