HGBL vs HLI

Heritage Global Inc. vs Houlihan Lokey, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HGBL

Capital Markets
Heritage Global Inc.
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.26
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

HLI

Capital Markets
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$145.77
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HGBL Fair ValueHGBL Upside HLI Fair ValueHLI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.76 +119.3% $169.87 +16.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.72 -42.9% $72.93 -50.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HGBL vs HLI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HGBL vs HLI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HLI scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs HGBL's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Heritage Global Inc. (HGBL) and Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HGBL currently trades at $1.26 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while HLI trades at $145.77 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).