HGBL vs HIVE

Heritage Global Inc. vs HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd — Valuation Comparison 2026

HGBL

Capital Markets
Heritage Global Inc.
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.26
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

HIVE

Capital Markets
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.45
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HGBL Fair ValueHGBL Upside HIVE Fair ValueHIVE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.76 +119.3% $1.18 -73.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.72 -42.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $0.22 -82.4% $2.10 -45.3%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HGBL vs HIVE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HGBL vs HIVE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HGBL scores higher with a 7.2/10 quality rating vs HIVE's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Heritage Global Inc. (HGBL) and HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd (HIVE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HGBL currently trades at $1.26 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while HIVE trades at $4.45 with a QOC of 2.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).