HESM vs INDO

Hess Midstream LP vs Indonesia Energy Corporation Li — Valuation Comparison 2026

HESM

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Hess Midstream LP
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$37.50
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

INDO

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Indonesia Energy Corporation Li
Quality
5.6
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$2.87
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HESM Fair ValueHESM Upside INDO Fair ValueINDO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $63.07 +68.2% $1.18 -58.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $12.95 -65.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $20.45 -45.5% $0.26 -91.8%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HESM vs INDO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HESM vs INDO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HESM scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs INDO's 5.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and Indonesia Energy Corporation Li (INDO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HESM currently trades at $37.50 with a QOC of 9.5/10, while INDO trades at $2.87 with a QOC of 5.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).