HERZ vs HNNA

Herzfeld Credit Income Fund, In vs Hennessy Advisors, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HERZ

Asset Management
Herzfeld Credit Income Fund, In
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$18.75
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

HNNA

Asset Management
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$10.10
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HERZ Fair ValueHERZ Upside HNNA Fair ValueHNNA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.96 -73.5% $19.05 +88.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.07 +9.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $21.61 +25.5% $5.09 -49.6%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HERZ vs HNNA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HERZ vs HNNA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HNNA scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs HERZ's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Herzfeld Credit Income Fund, In (HERZ) and Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (HNNA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HERZ currently trades at $18.75 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while HNNA trades at $10.10 with a QOC of 8.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).