HEI vs SIF

Heico Corporation vs SIFCO Industries, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HEI

Aircraft Engines & Engine Parts
Heico Corporation
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
31
LOW
Price
$348.18
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

SIF

Aircraft Engines & Engine Parts
SIFCO Industries, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$20.27
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HEI Fair ValueHEI Upside SIF Fair ValueSIF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $72.53 -79.2% $16.87 -16.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $59.81 -82.8% $12.99 -35.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HEI vs SIF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HEI vs SIF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HEI scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs SIF's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Heico Corporation (HEI) and SIFCO Industries, Inc. (SIF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HEI currently trades at $348.18 with a QOC of 9.7/10, while SIF trades at $20.27 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).