HD vs HVT

Home Depot, Inc. (The) vs Haverty Furniture Companies, In — Valuation Comparison 2026

HD

Home Improvement Retail
Home Depot, Inc. (The)
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
13
SAFE
Price
$321.21
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

HVT

Home Improvement Retail
Haverty Furniture Companies, In
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$23.82
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HD Fair ValueHD Upside HVT Fair ValueHVT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $140.50 -56.3% $18.76 -21.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $95.38 -70.3% $0.58 -97.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HD vs HVT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HD vs HVT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HD scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs HVT's 8.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Home Depot, Inc. (The) (HD) and Haverty Furniture Companies, In (HVT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HD currently trades at $321.21 with a QOC of 9.0/10, while HVT trades at $23.82 with a QOC of 8.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).