HCM vs HOWL

HUTCHMED (China) Limited vs Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HCM

Pharmaceutical Preparations
HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.45
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

HOWL

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
4.1
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$0.45
Last close
Models
7/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HCM Fair ValueHCM Upside HOWL Fair ValueHOWL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.53 -69.2% $0.17 -61.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.92 -78.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $28.56 +149.4% $0.05 -93.6%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HCM vs HOWL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HCM vs HOWL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HOWL scores higher with a 4.1/10 quality rating vs HCM's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing HUTCHMED (China) Limited (HCM) and Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc. (HOWL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HCM currently trades at $11.45 with a QOC of 2.5/10, while HOWL trades at $0.45 with a QOC of 4.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).