HCI vs HIPO

HCI Group, Inc. vs Hippo Holdings Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HCI

Insurance - Property & Casualty
HCI Group, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$154.54
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

HIPO

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Hippo Holdings Inc.
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$25.79
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HCI Fair ValueHCI Upside HIPO Fair ValueHIPO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $350.16 +126.6% $14.53 -43.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $249.49 +61.4% $35.74 +28.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HCI vs HIPO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HCI vs HIPO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HCI scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs HIPO's 8.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HCI currently trades at $154.54 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while HIPO trades at $25.79 with a QOC of 8.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).