HBNB vs IHG

Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. vs Intercontinental Hotels Group — Valuation Comparison 2026

HBNB

Hotels & Motels
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$5.94
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

IHG

Hotels & Motels
Intercontinental Hotels Group
Quality
2.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$154.88
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HBNB Fair ValueHBNB Upside IHG Fair ValueIHG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.59 -73.2% $58.41 -62.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $102.01 -29.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $0.10 -98.3% $281.92 +83.6%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HBNB vs IHG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HBNB vs IHG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IHG scores higher with a 2.1/10 quality rating vs HBNB's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. (HBNB) and Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HBNB currently trades at $5.94 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while IHG trades at $154.88 with a QOC of 2.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).