HBIO vs NAUT

Harvard Bioscience, Inc. vs Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HBIO

Laboratory Analytical Instruments
Harvard Bioscience, Inc.
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$5.88
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

NAUT

Laboratory Analytical Instruments
Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc.
Quality
4.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$2.74
Last close
Models
7/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HBIO Fair ValueHBIO Upside NAUT Fair ValueNAUT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $10.78 +83.4% $0.61 -77.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $14.18 +123.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.75 -85.7% $0.86 -68.7%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HBIO vs NAUT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HBIO vs NAUT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HBIO scores higher with a 5.7/10 quality rating vs NAUT's 4.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (HBIO) and Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. (NAUT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HBIO currently trades at $5.88 with a QOC of 5.7/10, while NAUT trades at $2.74 with a QOC of 4.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).