GVA vs MAGH

Granite Construction Incorporat vs Magnitude International Ltd — Valuation Comparison 2026

GVA

Engineering & Construction
Granite Construction Incorporat
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
15
SAFE
Price
$137.31
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

MAGH

Engineering & Construction
Magnitude International Ltd
Quality
5.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$6.76
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GVA Fair ValueGVA Upside MAGH Fair ValueMAGH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $10.34 -92.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $25.45 -81.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $277.90 +102.4% $0.26 -96.2%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $16.56 -87.9% $0.41 -94.0%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GVA vs MAGH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GVA vs MAGH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GVA scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs MAGH's 5.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Granite Construction Incorporat (GVA) and Magnitude International Ltd (MAGH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GVA currently trades at $137.31 with a QOC of 9.5/10, while MAGH trades at $6.76 with a QOC of 5.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).