GTX vs LEA

Garrett Motion Inc. vs Lear Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

GTX

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Garrett Motion Inc.
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$32.76
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

LEA

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Lear Corporation
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$143.12
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GTX Fair ValueGTX Upside LEA Fair ValueLEA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $12.00 -63.4% $41.62 -70.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $13.38 -59.2% $135.73 -5.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GTX vs LEA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GTX vs LEA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LEA scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs GTX's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Lear Corporation (LEA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GTX currently trades at $32.76 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while LEA trades at $143.12 with a QOC of 8.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).