GTX vs HLLY

Garrett Motion Inc. vs Holley Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GTX

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Garrett Motion Inc.
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$32.76
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

HLLY

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Holley Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$2.73
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GTX Fair ValueGTX Upside HLLY Fair ValueHLLY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $12.00 -63.4% $0.78 -71.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $13.38 -59.2% $1.16 -57.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GTX vs HLLY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GTX vs HLLY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HLLY scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs GTX's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Holley Inc. (HLLY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GTX currently trades at $32.76 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while HLLY trades at $2.73 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).