GTLS vs NKLR

Chart Industries, Inc. vs Terra Innovatum Global N.V. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GTLS

Fabricated Plate Work (Boiler Shops)
Chart Industries, Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$207.82
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

NKLR

Fabricated Plate Work (Boiler Shops)
Terra Innovatum Global N.V.
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$6.16
Last close
Models
7/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GTLS Fair ValueGTLS Upside NKLR Fair ValueNKLR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $12.49 -94.0% $1.49 -75.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $666.66 +220.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $247.38 +19.0% $5.24 -14.9%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GTLS vs NKLR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GTLS vs NKLR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GTLS scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs NKLR's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) and Terra Innovatum Global N.V. (NKLR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GTLS currently trades at $207.82 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while NKLR trades at $6.16 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).