GSL vs HMR

Global Ship Lease Inc New vs Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GSL

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Global Ship Lease Inc New
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$36.43
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

HMR

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp.
Quality
5.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$1.23
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GSL Fair ValueGSL Upside HMR Fair ValueHMR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.60 +30.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $131.68 +261.5% $0.70 -43.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $69.79 +91.6% $0.69 -13.1%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GSL vs HMR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GSL vs HMR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GSL scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs HMR's 5.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Global Ship Lease Inc New (GSL) and Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GSL currently trades at $36.43 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while HMR trades at $1.23 with a QOC of 5.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).