GS vs HUT

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) vs Hut 8 Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GS

Capital Markets
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$1008.37
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

HUT

Capital Markets
Hut 8 Corp.
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
19
SAFE
Price
$124.24
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GS Fair ValueGS Upside HUT Fair ValueHUT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $423.98 -58.0% $40.85 -67.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1409.28 +39.8% $6.12 -92.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GS vs HUT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GS vs HUT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GS scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs HUT's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) and Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GS currently trades at $1008.37 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while HUT trades at $124.24 with a QOC of 6.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).