Is GPUS or HMH more undervalued in 2026?

CirclFi compares Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and HMH Holding Inc. (HMH) using 13 institutional-grade valuation models. GPUS has a Quality of Company score of 3.1/10 while HMH scores 1.9/10.

Which is a better buy — GPUS or HMH?

Compare intrinsic values from 13 independent models against current market prices. CirclFi also calculates Value Trap scores. This is not financial advice — conduct your own analysis.

How do GPUS and HMH valuations compare?

GPUS at $0.19 and HMH at $21.36 are compared across Bayesian DCF, EPV, EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, and 8 additional models.

GPUS vs HMH Valuation Comparison 2026 — Intrinsic Value Analysis

GPUS

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment

Hyperscale Data, Inc.

Quality

3.1

out of 10

Value Trap

SAFE

Price

$0.19

Last close

Models

10/13

Active

HMH

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment

HMH Holding Inc.

Quality

1.9

out of 10

Value Trap

—

Price

$21.36

Last close

Models

8/13

Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

Model	Type	GPUS Fair Value	GPUS Upside	HMH Fair Value	HMH Upside
Bayesian DCF	Intrinsic	—	—	$6.00	-71.9%
Earnings Power Value	Intrinsic	$0.32	+132.1%	—	—
EROIC Spread	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
First Chicago	Scenario	$0.00	-98.0%	$42.34	+86.7%
Markov DDM	Intrinsic	$0.34	+78.3%	—	—
ML-RIV	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Dynamic NAV	Asset-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
PWERM	Option-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Sentiment SOTP	Hybrid	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
CUCE Ensemble	Ensemble	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
FTNN Topology	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
RCMH-DCF	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%

🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GPUS vs HMH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GPUS vs HMH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GPUS scores higher with a 3.1/10 quality rating vs HMH's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and HMH Holding Inc. (HMH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GPUS currently trades at $0.19 with a QOC of 3.1/10, while HMH trades at $21.36 with a QOC of 1.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).