GPI vs LAD

Group 1 Automotive, Inc. vs Lithia Motors, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GPI

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$326.44
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

LAD

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Lithia Motors, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$295.62
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GPI Fair ValueGPI Upside LAD Fair ValueLAD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $803.65 +146.2% $50.64 -81.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $220.23 -32.5% $100.71 -65.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GPI vs LAD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GPI vs LAD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LAD scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs GPI's 8.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (GPI) and Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GPI currently trades at $326.44 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while LAD trades at $295.62 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).