GP vs HYFM

GreenPower Motor Company Inc. vs Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GP

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
GreenPower Motor Company Inc.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.05
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

HYFM

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.
Quality
4.1
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$0.98
Last close
Models
1/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GP Fair ValueGP Upside HYFM Fair ValueHYFM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.28 -73.5% $2.27 +88.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.79 +75.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GP vs HYFM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GP vs HYFM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HYFM scores higher with a 4.1/10 quality rating vs GP's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing GreenPower Motor Company Inc. (GP) and Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GP currently trades at $1.05 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while HYFM trades at $0.98 with a QOC of 4.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).