GP vs HY

GreenPower Motor Company Inc. vs Hyster-Yale, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GP

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
GreenPower Motor Company Inc.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.05
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

HY

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Hyster-Yale, Inc.
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$36.30
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GP Fair ValueGP Upside HY Fair ValueHY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.28 -73.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.79 +75.9% $6.72 -83.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $1.30 +19.0% $72.22 +99.5%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GP vs HY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GP vs HY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HY scores higher with a 6.3/10 quality rating vs GP's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing GreenPower Motor Company Inc. (GP) and Hyster-Yale, Inc. (HY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GP currently trades at $1.05 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while HY trades at $36.30 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).