GNK vs HSHP

Genco Shipping & Trading Limite vs Himalaya Shipping Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GNK

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Genco Shipping & Trading Limite
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$24.06
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

HSHP

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$14.75
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GNK Fair ValueGNK Upside HSHP Fair ValueHSHP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $21.70 -9.8% $2.68 -81.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.17 -82.7% $0.92 -93.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GNK vs HSHP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GNK vs HSHP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GNK scores higher with a 7.5/10 quality rating vs HSHP's 7.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Genco Shipping & Trading Limite (GNK) and Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GNK currently trades at $24.06 with a QOC of 7.5/10, while HSHP trades at $14.75 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).