GLOB vs IBM

Globant S.A. vs International Business Machines — Valuation Comparison 2026

GLOB

Information Technology Services
Globant S.A.
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$39.93
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

IBM

Information Technology Services
International Business Machines
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$264.22
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GLOB Fair ValueGLOB Upside IBM Fair ValueIBM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $67.13 +68.1% $110.88 -58.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $23.54 -41.0% $10.91 -95.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GLOB vs IBM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GLOB vs IBM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GLOB scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs IBM's 6.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Globant S.A. (GLOB) and International Business Machines (IBM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GLOB currently trades at $39.93 with a QOC of 7.8/10, while IBM trades at $264.22 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).