GHC vs JDZG

Graham Holdings Company vs JIADE LIMITED — Valuation Comparison 2026

GHC

Education & Training Services
Graham Holdings Company
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$1123.52
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

JDZG

Education & Training Services
JIADE LIMITED
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
13
SAFE
Price
$4.18
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GHC Fair ValueGHC Upside JDZG Fair ValueJDZG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $752.26 -33.0% $1.92 -54.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $191.90 -82.9% $0.15 -87.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GHC vs JDZG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GHC vs JDZG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GHC scores higher with a 8.0/10 quality rating vs JDZG's 6.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Graham Holdings Company (GHC) and JIADE LIMITED (JDZG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GHC currently trades at $1123.52 with a QOC of 8.0/10, while JDZG trades at $4.18 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).