GEO vs SPHL

Geo Group Inc (The) REIT vs SPRINGVIEW HOLDINGS LTD — Valuation Comparison 2026

GEO

General Bldg Contractors - Residential Bldgs
Geo Group Inc (The) REIT
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$22.67
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SPHL

General Bldg Contractors - Residential Bldgs
SPRINGVIEW HOLDINGS LTD
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$2.43
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GEO Fair ValueGEO Upside SPHL Fair ValueSPHL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.23 -72.5% $0.98 -59.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.86 -95.4% $0.15 -94.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GEO vs SPHL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GEO vs SPHL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GEO scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs SPHL's 6.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Geo Group Inc (The) REIT (GEO) and SPRINGVIEW HOLDINGS LTD (SPHL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GEO currently trades at $22.67 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while SPHL trades at $2.43 with a QOC of 6.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).