GDRX vs HSTM

GoodRx Holdings, Inc. vs HealthStream, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GDRX

Health Information Services
GoodRx Holdings, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$2.97
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

HSTM

Health Information Services
HealthStream, Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$24.63
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GDRX Fair ValueGDRX Upside HSTM Fair ValueHSTM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $9.08 +205.8% $25.39 +3.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.54 -48.2% $14.76 -40.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GDRX vs HSTM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GDRX vs HSTM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HSTM scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs GDRX's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (GDRX) and HealthStream, Inc. (HSTM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GDRX currently trades at $2.97 with a QOC of 7.7/10, while HSTM trades at $24.63 with a QOC of 9.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).