GDL vs GEG

GDL Fund, The of Beneficial In vs Great Elm Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GDL

Asset Management
GDL Fund, The of Beneficial In
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$8.48
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

GEG

Asset Management
Great Elm Group, Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
34
LOW
Price
$2.16
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GDL Fair ValueGDL Upside GEG Fair ValueGEG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.24 -73.5% $4.11 +90.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.74 +33.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $4.20 -50.2% $10.76 +398.1%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GDL vs GEG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GDL vs GEG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GEG scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs GDL's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing GDL Fund, The of Beneficial In (GDL) and Great Elm Group, Inc. (GEG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GDL currently trades at $8.48 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while GEG trades at $2.16 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).