GBLI vs HMN

Global Indemnity Group, LLC vs Horace Mann Educators Corporati — Valuation Comparison 2026

GBLI

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Global Indemnity Group, LLC
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$26.63
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

HMN

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Horace Mann Educators Corporati
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$46.35
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GBLI Fair ValueGBLI Upside HMN Fair ValueHMN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $24.77 -7.0% $150.65 +225.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $19.68 -26.1% $19.91 -57.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GBLI vs HMN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GBLI vs HMN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HMN scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs GBLI's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Global Indemnity Group, LLC (GBLI) and Horace Mann Educators Corporati (HMN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GBLI currently trades at $26.63 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while HMN trades at $46.35 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).