GBLI vs HG

Global Indemnity Group, LLC vs Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GBLI

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Global Indemnity Group, LLC
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$27.00
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

HG

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$29.61
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GBLI Fair ValueGBLI Upside HG Fair ValueHG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $24.76 -8.3% $105.02 +254.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $19.68 -27.1% $32.40 +2.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GBLI vs HG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GBLI vs HG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HG scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs GBLI's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Global Indemnity Group, LLC (GBLI) and Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. (HG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GBLI currently trades at $27.00 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while HG trades at $29.61 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).