GBLI vs HCI

Global Indemnity Group, LLC vs HCI Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GBLI

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Global Indemnity Group, LLC
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$26.63
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

HCI

Insurance - Property & Casualty
HCI Group, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$154.54
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GBLI Fair ValueGBLI Upside HCI Fair ValueHCI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $24.77 -7.0% $350.16 +126.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $19.68 -26.1% $249.49 +61.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GBLI vs HCI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GBLI vs HCI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HCI scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs GBLI's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Global Indemnity Group, LLC (GBLI) and HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GBLI currently trades at $26.63 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while HCI trades at $154.54 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).