FURY vs HMY

Fury Gold Mines Limited vs Harmony Gold Mining Company Lim — Valuation Comparison 2026

FURY

Gold and Silver Ores
Fury Gold Mines Limited
Quality
4.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$0.58
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

HMY

Gold and Silver Ores
Harmony Gold Mining Company Lim
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$18.27
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FURY Fair ValueFURY Upside HMY Fair ValueHMY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.20 -65.7% $6.21 -66.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $17.92 -1.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.22 -62.2% $5.25 -71.3%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FURY vs HMY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FURY vs HMY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HMY scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs FURY's 4.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) and Harmony Gold Mining Company Lim (HMY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FURY currently trades at $0.58 with a QOC of 4.6/10, while HMY trades at $18.27 with a QOC of 9.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).