FTW vs GPOR

Presidio Production Company vs Gulfport Energy Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

FTW

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Presidio Production Company
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.98
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

GPOR

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Gulfport Energy Corporation
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$168.59
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FTW Fair ValueFTW Upside GPOR Fair ValueGPOR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.22 -73.1% $674.04 +299.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $249.29 +47.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $11.80 -1.6% $199.47 +16.5%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FTW vs GPOR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FTW vs GPOR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GPOR scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs FTW's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Presidio Production Company (FTW) and Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FTW currently trades at $11.98 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while GPOR trades at $168.59 with a QOC of 9.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).