FSK vs FTHY

FS KKR Capital Corp. vs FTHY — Valuation Comparison 2026

By CirclFi Research Team · Updated 2026-06-03 · Data from SEC EDGAR, FRED & GDELT

Quick Summary — FSK scores higher on quality with 4.2/10 vs FTHY's 1.8/10. FSK trades at $10.90 while FTHY trades at $13.53. Both analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR data across 13 institutional models.

FSK

Asset Management
FS KKR Capital Corp.
Quality
4.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$10.90
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

FTHY

Asset Management
FTHY
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$13.53
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
FSK
ML-RIV sees +81.5% upside
Quality 4.2/10 — below average
FTHY
2 models active
Quality 1.8/10 — below average

FSK vs FTHY — Fair Value Comparison

FSK
$0$8$16$23 Price$10.90 Bayesian …$8.29 (-23.9%) ML-RIV$19.78 (+81.5%)
FTHY
$0$5$11$16 Price$13.53 Bayesian …$3.52 (-74.0%) Markov DDM$12.88 (-4.8%)
Market Price Model 1 Model 2

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FSK Fair ValueFSK Upside FTHY Fair ValueFTHY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $8.29 -23.9% $3.52 -74.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $12.88 -4.8%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $19.78 +81.5% $10.10 -25.4%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%

FSK vs FTHY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued in 2026?

FSK scores higher with a 4.2/10 quality rating vs FTHY's 1.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

How Do FSK and FTHY Valuations Compare?

At $10.90, FSK trades +23.9% above its Bayesian DCF fair value of $8.29, while FTHY at $13.53 trades +74.0% above its estimate of $3.52. FTHY shows a wider gap between price and intrinsic value.

Quality of Company: FSK vs FTHY

FSK earns a Quality of Company score of 4.2/10 compared to FTHY's 1.8/10. This moderate difference suggests one company has an edge in fundamental quality, though both may offer investment merit depending on valuation. The QOC score synthesizes 32 signals spanning profitability margins, revenue growth, free cash flow, capital allocation, and leverage.

Value Trap Risk: FSK vs FTHY

Review the value trap analysis for both FSK and FTHY to assess whether apparent undervaluation reflects genuine opportunity or hidden fundamental risk.

Both in Asset Management

Both FSK and FTHY operate in Asset Management, which has 448 stocks tracked by CirclFi. Same-industry comparisons provide the most direct insight into relative valuation since both companies face similar regulatory environments, market dynamics, and competitive pressures. Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN), and ensemble methods (CUCE).

2 of 13 MODELS UNLOCKED

You’re comparing 2 models. 11 more have an opinion.

11 hidden models compare FSK vs FTHY differently — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more. Some may disagree with the 2 you see above.

11 additional fair values per stock Full confidence breakdown Live terminal — 5,000+ stocks

Bloomberg Terminal: ~$2,000/mo  ·  FactSet: ~$1,000/mo  ·  CirclFi: $0.90/day

See All 13 Models — $0.90/day

We don’t predict prices. We show you what 13 independent mathematical frameworks say a stock is worth — and let you decide.

See all Asset Management stocks →