FRT vs GIPR

Federal Realty Investment Trust vs Generation Income Properties In — Valuation Comparison 2026

FRT

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$119.63
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

GIPR

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Generation Income Properties In
Quality
3.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$0.21
Last close
Models
4/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FRT Fair ValueFRT Upside GIPR Fair ValueGIPR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $89.90 -24.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $49.74 -58.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $258.79 +116.3% $0.53 +93.0%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $117.97 -1.4% $2.83 +449.7%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FRT vs GIPR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FRT vs GIPR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FRT scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs GIPR's 3.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Generation Income Properties In (GIPR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FRT currently trades at $119.63 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while GIPR trades at $0.21 with a QOC of 3.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).