FRHC vs RILYP

Freedom Holding Corp. vs BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - Depo — Valuation Comparison 2026

FRHC

Financial Conglomerates
Freedom Holding Corp.
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
34
LOW
Price
$144.07
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

RILYP

Financial Conglomerates
BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - Depo
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$16.80
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FRHC Fair ValueFRHC Upside RILYP Fair ValueRILYP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $197.82 +37.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $37.43 -74.0% $25.49 +88.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $6.28 -95.8% $92.60 +451.2%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FRHC vs RILYP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FRHC vs RILYP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FRHC scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs RILYP's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) and BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - Depo (RILYP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FRHC currently trades at $144.07 with a QOC of 6.8/10, while RILYP trades at $16.80 with a QOC of 4.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).