FPS vs KE

Forgent Power Solutions, Inc. vs Kimball Electronics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FPS

Electrical Equipment & Parts
Forgent Power Solutions, Inc.
Quality
1.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$47.56
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

KE

Electrical Equipment & Parts
Kimball Electronics, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$26.49
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FPS Fair ValueFPS Upside KE Fair ValueKE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $15.86 -66.7% $46.37 +75.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.64 -69.7% $5.34 -79.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FPS vs KE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FPS vs KE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KE scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs FPS's 1.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Forgent Power Solutions, Inc. (FPS) and Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FPS currently trades at $47.56 with a QOC of 1.6/10, while KE trades at $26.49 with a QOC of 8.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).