FOXF vs LOBO

Fox Factory Holding Corp. vs LOBO TECHNOLOGIES LTD. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FOXF

Motorcycles, Bicycles & Parts
Fox Factory Holding Corp.
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$18.04
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

LOBO

Motorcycles, Bicycles & Parts
LOBO TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.79
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FOXF Fair ValueFOXF Upside LOBO Fair ValueLOBO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.66 -79.7% $0.13 -84.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $90.71 +402.8% $1.12 +73.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FOXF vs LOBO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FOXF vs LOBO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FOXF scores higher with a 7.3/10 quality rating vs LOBO's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) and LOBO TECHNOLOGIES LTD. (LOBO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FOXF currently trades at $18.04 with a QOC of 7.3/10, while LOBO trades at $0.79 with a QOC of 2.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).