FNKO vs HAS

Funko, Inc. vs Hasbro, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FNKO

Games, Toys & Children's Vehicles (No Dolls & Bicycles)
Funko, Inc.
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$5.68
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

HAS

Games, Toys & Children's Vehicles (No Dolls & Bicycles)
Hasbro, Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
33
LOW
Price
$86.17
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FNKO Fair ValueFNKO Upside HAS Fair ValueHAS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.11 -97.9% $59.49 -31.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.67 -70.6% $34.59 -59.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FNKO vs HAS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FNKO vs HAS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HAS scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs FNKO's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Funko, Inc. (FNKO) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FNKO currently trades at $5.68 with a QOC of 6.2/10, while HAS trades at $86.17 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).